Changing LanesLimited

Legal

Automated processing and AI notice

What the platform works out automatically, what it never decides, and how a person reviews it.

Draft for legal review

This document has been prepared from the platform as it is built today and must be reviewed by a UK solicitor before it is relied on. Details marked [to be confirmed: …] are company details we are still confirming (1 in this document).
Version
1.0 (draft)
Effective date
Applies to
Everyone
Owner and next review
Data Protection Lead · by
All legal documents

Our principle

The platform is built so that automation prepares, chases, schedules and routes — and people decide. No decision that has a legal or similarly significant effect on you (for example whether you are eligible for funding, whether you are admitted, whether you pass, whether you get a certificate, or whether you are hired) is made solely by automated means. This is how we meet Articles 22A to 22D of the UK GDPR (as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, in force 5 February 2026).

We do not use artificial intelligence to make decisions

The platform does not use machine-learning or generative AI models to assess, score or decide anything about people. The automated steps below are fixed, written rules that a person can read and check.

What is automated

What happens automatically, What it produces, Who decides
What happens automaticallyWhat it producesWho decides
Eligibility pre-check for a funded placeA recommendation — likely eligible, needs evidence, or refer to an officer — with its reasons, the funding rule version and any missing evidenceA member of staff with funding rights records the eligibility decision
Missing-evidence remindersReminders every few days up to a limit, then a named member of staff is toldStaff review every document
Completion and certificate readinessA draft completion confirmation and certificate once every requirement is recordedA tutor or lead confirms completion; a lead, compliance officer or administrator issues the certificate
Funding milestone evidence packsA pack of evidence for a milestone and a proposed claimOne person prepares and a different person approves; nothing is sent to a funder automatically
Scheduling assistantProposed practical slots and test booking windowsA lead or trainer opens slots; staff book tests
Learner nudges and remindersA reminder if you have not been active for 5 days, and the day before a test or sessionInformation only
Job matchingA match score between a vacancy and a job profile, always with its reasons (licence, Driver CPC, region, availability, experience, shift); never protected characteristicsEmployers and staff decide who to interview and hire
Vacancy and employer remindersClosing-soon, outcome and retention confirmation reminders; overdue invoice remindersEmployers confirm; staff follow up
Retention check-insA short survey to a placed driver; issues routed to a named member of staffThe named contact records the check-in
Data retentionA daily preview of records due for deletion or anonymisationCompliance applies it with a deliberate click
Security and abuse controlsRate limits on public forms; spam trap fieldsAutomatic, but they only delay or block a submission — you can contact us another way

Every automated action is logged, and a daily digest tells managers what was automated. An administrator can pause every job at once.

Analytics

Our own page-view counts and management statistics are aggregates and are not used to make decisions about individuals. Optional PostHog analytics is used only to improve the website (Cookie policy).

Your rights

If you think a decision about you was made without a person, or you disagree with a recommendation that was used, you can ask for a person to review it, give your point of view and contest the decision. Contact [to be confirmed: privacy and data protection email address]. See also Your data rights and how to use them and, for training decisions, the Assessment appeals policy.

Change history

Change history for Automated processing and AI notice
VersionDateChangeAcceptance needed again
1.0First draft for legal review, written from the platform as built.Yes — material change